
Charles II, reinstated as
the monarch, was approved of by the English because he supported the English
Church, but during his rule he tried to introduce increasingly liberal religious
tolerance, including towards Catholicism.
Because
there was still plenty of time for Charles to have an heir, there was not too
much concern in England when the King’s brother converted to Catholicism around
1668.
As time progressed Charles
II failed to produce a legitimate heir although it is known that he had many
bastard children with mistresses. Concern continued to grow that the throne
could pass to Catholic James. In 1685 Charles II died, converting to Catholicism
on his death bed and ushering in Britain’s last Catholic monarch, James VII of
Scotland and II of England and Ireland.![]()
There was a great deal of
concern over James VII’s religious persuasion and there had already been plots
to assassinate both him and his brother. However, when the Protestants took a
more careful look at the situation it was thought that it might not be as bad as
it had seemed at first glance.
Although Catholic himself,
James had converted after the birth of his two daughters, Mary and Anne, so when
he eventually died his Protestant daughter Mary would be able to take the throne
which would assuage the Protestant anxieties.
In addition, James was not
a well man and was in his mid-fifties, equivalent to almost seventy years in
today’s terms.
Even better news for the
Protestants was the fact that his daughter Mary had married the staunch
Protestant William of Orange from Holland and so a Protestant succession seemed
assured. But James was not as near death as the English had hoped.
The increasing concern over
the King’s Catholic activities came to a head when his new young Catholic bride
produced a son and heir. The English parliamentarians were horrified as, under
the British laws of succession, the son took precedence over the older daughters[1].
Suddenly the English were
facing a Catholic dynasty and that could not be tolerated under any
circumstances.
English nobles wrote to
Mary along the lines of, “Hope you are well, it is fine over here. By the way,
would you and your charming husband please invade!”
And
that is exactly what they did. Mary had insisted that William should not just be
her consort, but should also reign alongside her in his own right and so the
joint monarchs William and Mary marched into Britain. James escaped with his
young son down the River Thames to France. It was this escape which truly
polarised the British Isles and led to all the violence which followed.
I can only recount this in
very general terms as there are Protestants and Catholics in all parts of the
British Isles today, but at that time the English and Northern Irish were mainly
Protestant and supported William and Mary. The Southern Irish, Catholic,
supported James.
The Scottish situation was
rather more complex as although the majority of Scots were Protestant, the Scots
have always had a great loyalty towards their monarch. There was also a very
vociferous Catholic minority in the north so the Scots, at least the Northern
Scots supported James.
While James VI ushered in
the Jacobean era, it was to be his grandson, James VII for whom the name
Jacobite was coined. Both derive from the Latin for James, Jacobus.
The Jacobites rose up
against the illegal regime of William and Mary.
Jacobite Major “Bonnie”
Dundee won a great victory at Killiecrankie, but James was thoroughly defeated
at the battle of the Boyne in Ireland in 1689 and that really saw the end of
what became known as “The First Jacobite Uprising”.
In
the north of Scotland, the third largest of all the Scottish castles, Urquhart,
was destroyed by government forces in 1689 to prevent it being taken and used by
the Jacobites who had earlier put the castle under siege. Today Urquhart is a
spectacular ruin on the shores of Loch Ness, which it dominated for over four
hundred years.
Incidentally, if you are
visiting this castle check out the upward spiral staircase in the Grant tower. Most spiral staircases in medieval castles rose clockwise to
prevent a right-handed swordsman fighting his way up, but the Grant family were
mainly left-handed so they built their staircase with an anti-clockwise spiral.
The spiral from the lower storage room rises clockwise as the Grants themselves
would never have had to defend that stairwell. Check out them both and imagine
you are carrying a three foot[2]
long sword and the benefits of the design quickly become clear. This also helps
explain why it was not a good idea to be a left-handed person … you would be the
first to be sent up the staircase with the obvious reduced odds of surviving!
The total number of
Jacobite uprisings[3]
is sometimes given as three and at other times as up to five. Just to be
different I intend to deal only with four of them, 1689, 1715, 1717 and 1745/6.
After the first uprising we
were left with James VII living in exile in France and Mary and William reigning
jointly until Mary died in 1694, meaning that William then reigned in his own
right, despite the fact that he had no right!
James VII & II died in
1701, but his nemesis only outlived him for one year. While out riding one day
William’s horse stumbled in a mole hill and he was thrown, breaking his collar
bone.
The injury resulted in his
death in 1702 and ever since, Jacobites have enjoyed a new toast, “To the small
gentleman in the black furry waistcoat!”.
William
never visited Scotland, but the effect of his rule will never be forgotten and
included the massacre of Glen Coe when almost the entire MacDonald clan was
wiped out by the Redcoats. The Campbell family were very much implicated in the
treachery and this has created bad feeling ever since.
William, having left no
issue with Mary, was succeeded by Queen Anne who had had thirteen miscarriages
and five children who had already died. The succession was in trouble again.
In order to avoid James
VII’s son becoming King a law was cobbled together meaning that the throne must
remain Protestant. This meant that when Anne died, her second cousin, George,
sometimes called the “wee German Lairdie” would inherit the crown.
When that day arrived in
1714, the Jacobites were infuriated. James Stewart, or James the Old Pretender
(meaning old claimant) or James the Unnumbered as some like to call him, was
alive and waiting in France for the call to the throne. It was now unlikely to
happen and the scene was set for the second uprising.
The Earl of Mar and other
supporters such as Rob Roy MacGregor raised an army and awaited James’ arrival
in Scotland. They waited and waited and waited.
James turned up some three
months late for his own war and during that period the incompetent Earl of Mar
had lost most of the Jacobite force. James eventually arrived, took one look at
how badly things were progressing, stayed ten days and disappeared back to
France, never to set foot in Britain again.
The second uprising had
failed, Rob Roy MacGregor walked off with his head in his hands in disgust and
the clan chiefs mourned yet another entire generation of young Highlanders lost
in the name of Jacobitism.
Another more minor uprising
occurred in the west a while later, centred on the picturesque Eilean Donan
Castle which was occupied by Spanish forces supporting the Jacobite cause.
To the east a battle was
fought in Glen Shiel, but government forces were able to overpower the
Highlanders and government ships also made their way in from the Sound of Sleat
to destroy Eilean Donan Castle with mortar fire. The castle which goes by that
name today was almost entirely rebuilt in the nineteen-thirties.
Was this the end of the
Jacobite period or would there be a more decisive uprising in the future?
[1] This system is still in place and there are moves afoot to have it changed before William marries and causes a constitutional crisis by perhaps having a daughter prior to a son! Can you imagine the furore if a daughter should be passed over in decades to come in order to make way for a younger brother?
[2] Approximately one metre.
[3] I have chosen the word “uprising” because that is what these events were. They were not, as often described, “rebellions”. When I was scripting the Fort Augustus Abbey Heritage Centre in 1994, I remember being called into Abbot Mark Dilworth’s office and he announced to me that he was about to begin my education. He asked to what I referred with the word “rebellion” and when I said “the Jacobites” he raised his voice and said, “they were not rebellions, they were uprisings!”.
I meekly pointed out that the dictionary definitions were almost identical and he said, “A rebellion is when you are rebelling against something legal, but an uprising is when you are rising up against something illegal. James was the legitimate king and therefore it was an uprising!”. I found the logic of this undeniable and have since made every effort to get websites all over the world to change any use of Jacobite rebellions to Jacobite uprisings.
![]() |
| Toyota Optimo V |